Crisis in Science Research Crisis in Science results that are not reproducible: it is a sensitive topic within science. In particular, research that has to do with psychology is subject to a lot of criticism. Why is the replication crisis relevant to you as a specialist in the online field?
The term replication crisis generally refers to the criticism that many research results do not seem to be reproducible. The field of psychology in particular seems to receive a lot of criticism about this. Partly because of the Reproducibility Project: Psychology .
Researchers who participated in this attempted to reproduce the results of 100 studies. 97 of those 100 studies initially indicated that they had found a significant effect result. However, in the attempts at reproduction, about 36% of them were found to be replicable by researchers from the Reproducibility Project.
Although the word replication crisis sounds alarming, there is certainly optimism and hope. I will explain it further in this article.
What could be the causes?
How does science respond?
Practical examples
Why is this relevant for online?
What could be the causes?
There are several explanations for the replication crisis.
The growing amount of bureaucratic tasks leaving less time for actual research.
Competition for financial grants to carry out your research.
Fraud, such as that of Diederik Stapel , professor of social psychology.
Insufficient preparation to conduct research as accurately as possible, or too few respondents.
An incentive to demonstrate positive effects so that your paper/study gets published or the pressure to publish something at all. Also known as publish or perish .
Social circumstances that change. For example, research rwanda email list 120446 contact leads from the previous century does not necessarily have to be poorly conducted. It may also be that certain research results were valid at the time, but are no longer relevant today.
Scientific research in the replica crisis.
How does science respond?
Of course, the subject is alive within science and therefore there is also reason for optimism. Researchers are aware of the problem and are thinking about solutions. For example, they are thinking about:
how we can make results more robust, for example the future of b2b lead generation: new trends and technologies with larger sample sizes.
incentives. There is currently a pressure to publish studies that have shown a significant effect rather than studies that could not show an effect. Perhaps a culture change is needed here.
greater transparency, for example making used datasets publicly available.
Practical examples
What are concrete examples of studies that we cannot alb directory reproduce or can only partially reproduce? I will name a few.
Example 1
Daniel Kahneman’s famous book Thinking Fast and Slow was criticized because certain studies he cited were difficult or impossible to reproduce.
Kahneman himself agreed with the criticism and later said: “ I placed too much faith in underpowered studies .” For example, Kahneman refers in the book to a study that suggested that respondents walked more slowly after being exposed to words related to old age. But that research could not be reproduced later. In particular, the section in Kahneman’s book that deals with the priming effect is criticized.