That’s a lot of money! It’s even too much in proportion to the total expenditure because it does not allow for the acquisition of connectivity. The resources or the financing of teacher training. It remains insufficient to acquire equipment for all students and to renew it as it becomes obsolete. Today equipment rate is approximately 8.5 students per work terminal in primary school. The 3 in middle school and 2.5 in high school and it will be difficult to do better or even maintain these equipment rates over time. This means that we do not have the means for a systematic equipment policy for students.
We must rely on the equipment of students
Their families and shift public spending towards helping to equip more modest families. The cell phone database reucing white areas. The acquiring collective equipment. The quality resources and towards teacher training. The environmental cost of digital technology is very high. All studies show that we nee to react strongly and quickly. This means that we also nee to think about eucational digital technology from this perspective .
We can do this in two ways
The first is to raise awareness among teachers and their students about the issue of and it has significant environmental sustainability of the use of digital technologies and to indicate how everyone can have more responsible uses with a reuce environmental impact . The second is to question the usefulness of using eucational digital technology. When there is a real eucational or didactic adde value. The we should not hesitate to use these techniques.
Otherwise
The it is better to give them up. It is a principle of parsimony. The greatest attention ukraine business directory must therefore be paid. The well beyond compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The to the data collecte. Source. Shutterstock On the other hand. The the traces of students’ digital activities constitute personal data that testify to the dynamics of their learning but also to their behaviors and the values that drive them .